From 'bone shakers' to sleek hill climbers, here's a look at the evolution of the bicycle.
Proposed changes to the European Union Intellectual Property Office's (EUIPO) Design Guidelines have important implications for anyone looking to file a design application. Here, we explain what these changes might mean for you, including the requirements that you must check before submitting a priority claim.
The EUIPO’s Design Guidelines are revised regularly to make sure that they reflect changes in law and practice. Recently, a draft version of the Guidelines was released, giving us a sneak peek at the changes that are expected to come into force this October.
One major change which could affect current practice is the plan to stop the substantive examination of priority claims during the pre-registration procedure.
When you’re filing a design application, it's sometimes possible to claim ‘priority’ from an earlier design application. Claiming priority is useful if a design application is initially filed in a single country before it’s realised that the design would benefit from the European-wide protection of a Community design application.
The priority date is linked to the filing date, which is important because it determines the date at which known designs can be considered relevant to the novelty and individual character of a design.
Novelty means that the design has to differ from known designs by more than immaterial details. Individual character means that the design must produce a different overall impression on the informed user compared to designs which are already known.
At the EUIPO, priority can be claimed within six months of the filing date of the earliest design application. This is significant, because if the validity of the design is challenged, the EUIPO will determine which designs were already known using the filing date of the priority application, rather than the filing date of the later application.
At present, an application for a Community design application undergoes examination before it’s registered. The examination does not examine novelty or individual character — instead it examines details such as the format of the design representations and the validity of the priority details.
Under current practice, if the examination highlights a deficiency, this issue would be raised with the applicant, who would be given the opportunity to correct the deficiency within two months.
Under the draft Design Guidelines, only the formalities of a priority claim will be examined — not the validity. The formality requirements include:
The EUIPO will not confirm the validity of the priority claim and will simply publish it 'as claimed'. Under the proposed guidelines, it's therefore possible that a Community design may be registered with an invalid priority claim.
The substantive requirements which must be met for a priority claim to be considered valid under Article 41 of the Community Design Registration will only be examined after registration, during invalidity proceedings. The draft Design Guidelines highlight that this examination will be based on the copies of the priority documents submitted. It's therefore the responsibility of the applicant to submit a copy of the priority documents and, where applicable, translations of them at the filing stage, in order to allow the priority claim to be examined substantively during invalidity proceedings.
If the validity of the priority claim cannot be verified, the priority claim cannot be taken into account for the purpose of the proceedings. The decision on the priority claim can only be appealed together with the final decision on the invalidity proceedings.
It’s likely that this decision was made to speed up the processing of applications. In theory, the proposed changes will save time being spent on the examination of a priority claim for design applications which are never contested.
However — although a faster design registration process might sound advantageous, it does have a drawback. Priority claims will have to be well scrutinised before they are submitted, and some substantive requirements may be harder to check. For example, if a priority claim is submitted for a design in which it's claimed that the later design application has only immaterial differences compared to the priority application, the applicant may risk losing the priority claim if this is later challenged and the designs are found to relate to different designs.
Make sure you check (and double check!) the following substantive requirements before submitting your priority claim to the EUIPO:
The draft proposals are expected to be adopted this September, and enter into force in October. We’ll provide an update when the final Design Guidelines are available.
To find out more, feel free to get in touch with me at firstname.lastname@example.org, or call me on +44 113 245 2388. You can also learn more about registered Community designs here.
You may also be interested in these...
EU customs warehousing provides no safe harbour for ‘debranding’ importers.
Companies and rights owners in the UK can now use the Hague System to register industrial designs.